Before the collapse in real estate values, mortgagees never
had to consider filing two claims when the mortgagor filed bankruptcy. After
all, the value of real property typically held steady if not increased in
value, so a lender’s claim would be fully covered by the collateral. Today, everything has changed. It is not
uncommon to see property, both residential and commercial, being sold by lenders
at a fraction of its original value, leaving a deficiency balance to be
collected that is unsecured.
A mortgage holder that wants to ensure it is fully protected
when a borrower files for bankruptcy protection should file a proof of claim for
both the secured claim and the unsecured portion of its secured claim.
In November 2011, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals handed
the IRS an unpleasant surprise when it held that the IRS waived its rights with
respect to plan voting and distribution towards the unsecured portion of its
secured claim due to its failure to affirmative file a proof of claim for the
unsecured portion. (I confess that I enjoyed the IRS getting smacked
down.) The IRS argued that its secured claims were automatically bifurcated
into a secured and unsecured claim under Section 506(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy
Code. The court disagreed holding that an undersecured creditor must signal its
intent to pursue a deficiency claim as this serves an important notice function
providing the trustee of the bankruptcy estate and other creditors an
opportunity to contest the claim.
For now this decision only controls for those located in the
Eleventh Circuit (i.e., Alabama, Florida and Georgia). Only time will tell whether any of the other
Courts of Appeal will follow the Eleventh Circuit or not. In the meantime, it’s
best to take care in how your proof of claim is filed to ensure you do not inadvertently
waive your rights and end up like the IRS._______________________________
No comments :
Post a Comment