A Legal Update
By: Luther L.
Liggett, Jr., Kohrman Jackson & Krantz PLL
Introduction
Across Ohio, county
auditors improperly classify Portable Grain Bins installed by the agricultural
industry as incorporated into real estate, and therefore taxable for property
tax valuation.
In a case of
first-impression, the Ohio Supreme Court upheld the Board of Tax Appeals in
declaring that a “grain storage bin” is a “business fixture,” and therefore not
part of the real estate valuation.
Therefore, farmers
and agricultural businesses should not pay property tax on their farm equipment
including Grain Storage Bins.
Factual Background
Among the county
auditor’s duties is the appraisal of real estate for valuation, against which
the county levies Property Taxes.
Typically the auditor will include any improvement incorporated into the
real estate.
Farm operations
typically include barns, permanent silos, elevators, and grain storage
bins. The county auditor may not
distinguish among these different facilities, as all are relatively “permanent”
and add value to the tax duplicate, increasing the property tax base.
Yet agriculture is
a business, no different than any manufacturing concern that installs heavy
equipment in unique business facilities.
Those manufacturing facilities are exempt from property tax, because the
land cannot be sold for the higher value to an ordinary buyer not in the same
business.
The Metamora
Elevator Company owns and operates eight acres of land containing silos,
storage bins, tanks, and buildings used to process and to store grain.
Metamora filed
complaints with the Fulton County Board of Revision, alleging that its “grain
storage bins” on the premises should be classified as personal property not
subject to property taxes. This would
reduce the “land” value subject to annual property taxes by over $500,000.00.
In other factual
examples, similar agricultural businesses depreciate such grain storage bins as
personal property.
Typical Grain
Storage Bins are modular, corrugated units bolted to a concrete foundation,
which can be dissembled and moved. In
contrast, silos are considered permanent and constitute realty.
On appeal to the
Ohio Board of Tax Appeals determined that the storage bins were temporary
structures and therefore personal property, exempt from property taxes which
apply only to real property.
The Ohio Supreme
Court declared the Grain Storage Bins to be “business fixtures” without the
need to determine whether they also constitute personal property.
Legal Analysis
In determining
whether a land owner’s real estate should increase in value for property tax purposes,
the county auditor must look to the definitions in law. R.C. 5701.02 defines real property:
As used in Title LVII of the Revised Code:
(A) 'Real property,' 'realty,' and 'land' include
land itself . . . with all things contained therein, and, unless otherwise
specified in this section or 5701.03 of the Revised Code, all buildings,
structures, improvements, and fixtures of whatever kind on the land…
A practical test is
whether the land owner might sell the property for a higher value as a result of
the improvement. Starting with bare
land, building a new home on it would result in an increase in valuation for
property tax purposes.
In contrast, the
Ohio legislature does not treat “personal property” that happens to be located
on the real estate as adding to the value.
A simple example is whether the “improvement” is not permanently affixed
but can be removed. This is often
referred to as “the Jolly Green Giant” test: if the building is picked upside
down and shaken, anything not affixed is not real estate for purposes of
valuation.
Another example is
whether the “improvement” is related only to a business, and would be of no
value to an ordinary purchaser of the land unless in the same business. In a typical building, water plumbing pipes
add value to the building. But in a beer
brewery, the process piping through which the beer runs is a business fixture,
and does not count toward raising the value of the real estate.
Applying these
considerations to a Grain Storage Bin, even the concrete pad beneath the
Portable Grain Bin and elevator equipment is considered a “business fixture”
even though it cannot be moved. If sold
to an ordinary buyer, the new owner may consider the unusable concrete pad even
to detract from the value of the land.
In 1992, the Ohio
General Assembly amended the definition of “personal property” to include
“business fixtures.” The test is whether the equipment “primarily benefits” the
business or the realty. R.C. 5701.03 defines personal property:
As used in Title LVII of the Revised Code:
(A) “Personal property” includes every tangible
thing that is the subject of ownership . . . including a business fixture, and
that does not constitute real property as defined in section 5701.02 of the
Revised Code.
(B) “Business fixture” means an item of tangible
personal property that has become permanently attached or affixed to the land
or to a building, structure, or improvement, and that primarily benefits the
business conducted by the occupant on the premises and not the realty. 'Business
fixture' includes, but is not limited to, machinery, equipment, signs, storage
bins and tanks, whether above or below ground, ****
Consistently, Ohio
sales tax law treats Grain Storage Bins as personal property. When an agricultural business purchases a
Portable Grain Bin, the owner/purchaser must pay (and the seller/contractor
must collect and remit,) Ohio sales tax, because R.C. 5739.01(B)(5)(b)
expressly declares the Portable Grain Bin to be personal property, not
incorporated into the real estate, and therefore constitutes a taxable
sale. Thus, Ohio law expressly defines a
Portable Grain Bin as personal property for purposes of sales tax in
construction:
Ohio Administrative
Code 5703-9-14:
(C) The sale and installation
of the following items is never a construction contract and such transactions
are to be treated as the sale and installation of tangible personal property
for sales tax purposes:
* * *
(3) Portable grain bins as defined in division
(B)(5)(b) of section 5739.01 of the Revised Code;
R.C.
5739.01(B)(5)(b) is conclusive of legislative intent:
"Portable grain bin" means a structure
that is used or to be used by a person engaged in farming or agriculture to
shelter the person's grain and that is designed to be disassembled without significant
damage to its component parts.
Therefore, state
law requires that an agricultural business pay sales tax on installation of
Portable Grain Bins at the time of purchase.
It is unfair first to charge Sales Tax to an agricultural business such
as Metamora, treating the assembly of a Portable Grain Bin as personal property,
then turn around and charge Property Tax as though the same facility is a
permanent improvement to the real estate.
Accordingly, Portable Grain Bins taxed as personal property for sales
tax should not be taxed a second time as real property.
Court Decision
The Ohio Supreme
Court upheld the Ohio Board of Tax Appeals, declaring that an agricultural Grain
Storage Bin should be classified as a “business fixture” not subject to real estate
tax. Given the value of such large
facilities, the reduction in property tax to an agricultural owner can be
significant.
The Supreme Court streamlined
consideration of whether the item is a “business fixture” without having to
consider whether it is “real property.”
The Court found that the legislature declared storage bins to be
business fixtures, and that will suffice to exempt them from property taxes.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court
decision removes any doubt that Grain Storage Bins are considered “business
fixtures” and exempt from property taxes.
This should result in significant savings across the agricultural
industry in Ohio.
With this court
precedent, farmers and agricultural businesses now can file a complaint with
the county board of revision, asking that the valuation of their land be
reduced by the value of any grain storage bin.
Editor’s
Note: Luther L. Liggett, Jr. and David M. Scott (of Kohrman
Jackson & Krantz)
filed a brief in this case with the Ohio Supreme Court urging affirmance for amicus curiae (friend of the Court)
Central Ohio Farmers Co-Op.
Mr.
Liggett focuses his practice in government contracting, administrative
procedure, state licensure, construction law, property tax revision, mortgage
banking, legislative lobbying, government policy formation, and litigation. For
more information, contact:
Luther
L. Liggett, Jr., Kohrman Jackson & Krantz-10 W. Broad Street,
19th Floor Columbus OH 43215-(614) 427-5742 - LLL@kjk.com.
1 comment :
It is just fair for farmers to not be expected to pay property tax for their on-farm storage facilities. This is because the purpose of those is for business purposes and should not be treated as part of their main property.
Post a Comment